<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>archGFX &#187; sustainability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://archgfx.net/tag/sustainability/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://archgfx.net</link>
	<description>Austin web designer - Adam Freetly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 18:01:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>You get what you pay for</title>
		<link>http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/arch/you-get-what-you-pay-for</link>
		<comments>http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/arch/you-get-what-you-pay-for#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/arch/you-get-what-you-pay-for</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Inhabitat links to a report that says sustainable architecture isn't much more expensive. But In Picenum says sustainable office buildings don't perform that much better. This post is purely anecdotal. I seriously doubt that spending enough money would solve the problem of efficiency.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://archgfx.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/heifer1.jpg" alt="heifer1.jpg" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/09/05/the-costs-of-green-architecture/">Inhabitat links to</a> a report that says <a href="http://www.wbcsd.org/plugins/DocSearch/details.asp?txtDocTitle=energy%20efficiency%20in%20buildings&amp;txtDocText=energy%20efficiency%20in%20buildings&amp;DocTypeId=-1&amp;ObjectId=MjU5MTE&amp;URLBack=result%2Easp%3FtxtDocTitle%3Denergy+efficiency+in+buildings%26txtDocText%3Denergy+efficiency+in+buildings%26DocTypeId%3D%2D1%26SortOrder%3D%26CurPage%3D1">sustainable architecture isn't much more expensive</a>.</p>
<p><img src="http://archgfx.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/gibbsbuilding.jpg" alt="gibbsbuilding.jpg" /></p>
<p>But <a href="http://inpicenum.com/2007/08/24/no-such-thing-as-a-green-office/">In Picenum says sustainable office buildings don't perform that much better</a>.</p>
<p><ins datetime="2007-09-07T14:10:48+00:00">This post is purely anecdotal.  I seriously doubt that spending enough money would solve the problem of efficiency.</ins></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/arch/you-get-what-you-pay-for/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dammit Sony,</title>
		<link>http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/geek/dammit-sony</link>
		<comments>http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/geek/dammit-sony#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 13:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geekery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rootkit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/geek/dammit-sony</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I want to hate you, but I really just can't. How can one company be so smart and so evil?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.managingrights.com/2007/08/sony-rootkit-re.html">I want to hate you</a>, but I <a href="http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/News/Press/200708/07-074E/index.html">really just can't</a>. How can one company be so smart and so evil?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/geek/dammit-sony/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

