<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>archGFX &#187; open-source</title>
	<atom:link href="http://archgfx.net/tag/open-source/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://archgfx.net</link>
	<description>Austin web designer - Adam Freetly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 18:01:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The End of Wank</title>
		<link>http://archgfx.net/blog/2008/geek/blogging/the-end-of-wank</link>
		<comments>http://archgfx.net/blog/2008/geek/blogging/the-end-of-wank#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 02:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open-source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archgfx.net/?p=1426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently wanted to link to some thoughts I'd posted previously, and it was shocking to realize just much my writing and attitudes have changed in the last year.  I've been disinterested in the drama that seems to follow WordPress around.  I made one last attempt to deal with the goings on at wankpress, but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently <a title="No, design is never art." href="http://isgraphicdesignart.com/">wanted to link to</a> some thoughts <a href="http://twitter.com/sunburntkamel/status/1000667146">I'd posted previously</a>, and it was shocking to realize just much my writing and attitudes have changed in the last year.  I've been disinterested in the drama that seems to follow WordPress around.  I made one last attempt to deal with the goings on at <a href="http://wank.wordpress.com/2008/10/26/automattic-v-designers-part-378194/#comments">wankpress</a>, but it seems that my comment is hanging out in indefinite moderation, much like she complains about at ma.tt:</p>
<blockquote><p>I think it comes down to how designers and developers sell themselves, and the expectations put on them. Where a developer can talk about their skills, their contributions to a project, designers are expected to walk in with a portfolio of projects that they’ve designed from start to finish, on their own or as part of a team.</p>
<p>I think it’s also important that while software is great at iterating and evolving, design projects are delivered as a fixed quantity, and expected to work perfectly from day 1. I think there’s room for an open source design paradigm, but I think that much of the artwork for <abbr title="open source">OS</abbr> projects is delivered using a closed process.</p>
<p>To some extent, delivering it that way seems to work better for developers. They have one absolute standard to code against and solve, rather than having each revision in the design process necessitate many more code revisions.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I suppose since the company I work for is listed on the page she's wanking about, it's reasonable that I would be considered untrustworthy.  I think it says more about that status of the wankery, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://archgfx.net/blog/2008/geek/blogging/the-end-of-wank/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Source tags and codes</title>
		<link>http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/geek/blogging/source-tags-and-codes</link>
		<comments>http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/geek/blogging/source-tags-and-codes#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 01:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open-source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoshop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandbox]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/geek/blogging/source-tags-and-codes</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I've been meaning to release this stuff for a while, it's just that around the time I finish any design project, I'm sick to the gills of looking at it. Even just opening the Photoshop files to check the color profile is nauseating. Nonetheless, Falak asked, so everyone receives. here's the Sandbox *.PSD's, for use [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've been meaning to release this stuff for a while, it's just that around the time I finish any design project, I'm sick to the gills of looking at it.  Even just opening the Photoshop files to check the color profile is nauseating.  Nonetheless, <a href="http://archgfx.net/blog/2006/geek/blogging/i-heart-sandbox#comment-20279">Falak asked</a>, so everyone receives.</p>
<p>here's the Sandbox *.PSD's, for use promoting the Sandbox theme for wordpress.  Included are the yellow and gray gradient versions, and the solid color file.  there's also the original <acronym title='Portable Document Format'><span class='caps'>PDF</span></acronym> of the sandbox outline, printed from AutoCAD.  probably not the most attractive vector file ever.  I have a strange monitor profile, which usually monkeys with the way files display for other people.  the wp-sndbx image should look <a href="http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/geek/blogging/speaking-of-sandbox-themes/wp-sandbox-logo/" rel="attachment wp-att-1128" title="WP Sandbox Logo">like this</a>, <a href="http://www.sndbx.org/competition/about-the-sandbox/sandbox-logo-image-by-adam-freetly/">not like scott's</a>.  I saved them without the profile this time around, so it should be okay.  If it's not, yell at me in the comments.</p>
<p><a href="http://archgfx.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/sandbox3.zip" class="download" title="sandbox3.zip">sandbox3.zip</a></p>
<p>I've also been meaning to release the *.PSD files from <a href="http://archgfx.net/graphics/themes/walk-in-the-shadows">Walk in the Shadows</a>, since it does little good to develop a non-<acronym title='PHP Hypertext Processor'><span class='caps'>PHP</span></acronym> theme as <acronym title='GNU General Public License'><span class='caps'>GPL</span></acronym>, and only open-source the <acronym title='Cascading Style Sheets'><span class='caps'>CSS</span></acronym>.  Well, it depends on how graphically intensive your theme is.  <a href="http://archgfx.net/graphics/themes/promised-land">Promised Land</a> uses 2 images, which come from an image I no longer have the PSD for.</p>
<p><a href="http://archgfx.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/wits0.zip" class="download" title="wits0.zip">wits0.zip</a></p>
<p>My workflow seems to differ a bit from most designers', as I understand it.  I do my initial layout in <acronym title='Cascading Style Sheets'><span class='caps'>CSS</span></acronym>, in browser, and then size my PSD according to the width that I need.  The document is only tall enough to accommodate the elements I'll be exporting.  I don't see much point in organizing type in a graphics editor.  The design happens in my head, or on paper, so I don't need to look at the whole page to see whether it works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/geek/blogging/source-tags-and-codes/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>downhill orgy</title>
		<link>http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/music/downhill-orgy</link>
		<comments>http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/music/downhill-orgy#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 16:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downhill battle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open-source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenID]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archgfx.net/blog/index.php/2007/music/downhill-orgy</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[so, let me get this straight, ozzfest announces that they're fighting rising ticket prices by making theirs free, apple attempts to shame the music industry by coming out against DRM, and microsoft becomes one of the biggest proponents of OpenID.  i must be dreaming.  this is too good.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so, let me get this straight, ozzfest announces that they're <a href="http://www.ozzfest.com/news_2006.html">fighting rising ticket prices</a> by making theirs free, apple attempts to shame the music industry by c<a href="http://www.apple.com/hotnews/thoughtsonmusic/">oming out against <acronym title='Digital Rights Management'><span class='caps'>DRM</span></acronym></a>, and microsoft becomes one of the <a href="http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2007/02/06/openid-creates-a-foundation-as-microsoft-pledges-support/">biggest proponents of OpenID</a>.  i <em>must</em> be dreaming.  this is too good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/music/downhill-orgy/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Raising the Architect from the dead</title>
		<link>http://archgfx.net/blog/2006/arch/raising-the-architect-from-the-dead</link>
		<comments>http://archgfx.net/blog/2006/arch/raising-the-architect-from-the-dead#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 17:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open-source]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archgfx.net/blog/index.php/2006/arch/raising-the-architect-from-the-dead</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Danah Boyd has a nice post about architecture as persistant beta, and how buildings might be fashioned like websites, fitted with a benevolent dictator, as a participant in the building's evolution.  she asks: "Should the architect support the aging of the house to allow it to become eccentric?" It's certainly an argument for modularity.  Pods [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Danah Boyd has a nice post about <a href="http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2006/07/14/from_architectu.html">architecture as persistant beta</a>, and how buildings might be fashioned like websites, fitted with a benevolent dictator, as a participant in the building's evolution.  she asks:</p>
<blockquote><p>"Should the architect support the aging of the house to allow it to become eccentric?"</p></blockquote>
<p>It's certainly an argument for modularity.  <a href="http://greg.org/2006/06/urban_nomads_21st_centurystyle.html">Pods</a> as upgrades, perhaps? This is half a thought at best, but better to post and revisit later, than forget entirely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://archgfx.net/blog/2006/arch/raising-the-architect-from-the-dead/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Free Software for Windows</title>
		<link>http://archgfx.net/blog/2006/geek/free-software-for-windows</link>
		<comments>http://archgfx.net/blog/2006/geek/free-software-for-windows#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 03:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[geekery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[download]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noteworthy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open-source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archgfx.net/blog/?p=290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i've been asked about this a bit lately, so i'm going to lay this out in one place, so i don't have to repeat myself. Ever since i switched back to windows, it's been my goal to not depend on pay-for software. there are 3 programs i depend on that aren't free and open-source. this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i've been asked about this a bit lately, so i'm going to lay this out in one place, so i don't have to repeat myself.  Ever since i <a href="http://www.archgfx.net/blog/index.php/2004/geek/what-ive-been-doing-instead-of-blogging">switched back to windows</a>, it's been my goal to not depend on pay-for software.  there are 3 programs i depend on that aren't free and open-source.  this is a list of everything else.</p>
<p>Except as noted, these programs are all <a href="http://www.opensource.org/docs/definition.php">open source</a>.  meaning that the source code is freely distributed, so anyone with the know-how can change or improve the software.  it also means that these programs are free (like free beer), and that the current version will always be free.</p>
<p><strong>Instant Messaging</strong><br />
<a href="http://gaim.sf.net">GAIM</a><br />
everyone hates ads.  so why do you let <acronym title='America Online'><span class='caps'>AOL</span></acronym> (or <acronym title='Microsoft Network'><span class='caps'>MSN</span></acronym> or yahoo!) serve them to you every time you want to talk to your friends?  for that matter, why install 3 different programs just so you can talk to friends that aren't all on the same network?  GAIM chats on <acronym title='America Online'><span class='caps'>AOL</span></acronym>'s network, Yahoo!'s network, and <acronym title='Microsoft Network'><span class='caps'>MSN</span></acronym>.  easy.</p>
<p><strong>Web Browsing</strong><br />
<a href="http://spreadfirefox.com/community/?q=affiliates&#038;id=85128&#038;t=82">Firefox</a><br />
if you're still using internet explorer, you haven't been listening to a word i've said for years now, i'm not sure why you would start now, but here goes.  every spyware toolbar ever written, was written for internet explorer.  you know that saying about "don't give the devil a foothold"?  apply it to your web browser.</p>
<p><strong>Anti Virus</strong><br />
<a href="http://free.grisoft.com/doc/2/lng/us/tpl/v5">AVG Free</a><br />
<strong>Not Open Source</strong>.  i mainly like this because it isn't nagware, it's just free.  microsoft's <a href="https://www.windowsonecare.com/Default.aspx">onecare</a> seems to do too much, and i'm not a fan of the firewall built into windows.</p>
<p><strong>Firewall</strong><br />
all the free firewall options are gone.  i use sygate, which symantec bought.  figures.  symantec's firewall is top notch.  black ice is no longer free, either.  <a href="http://www.zonelabs.com/store/content/company/products/znalm/freeDownload.jsp?dc=12bms&#038;ctry=US&#038;lang=en&#038;lid=staticcomp_za">Zone Alarm</a> is the only one left.  zone alarm will give you better contol over your ports and which programs are trying to reach the internet.  but i haven't used it.</p>
<p><strong>Email</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.mozilla.com/thunderbird/">Thunderbird</a><br />
when i used an email program, i used thunderbird.  it's better and safer than outlook express.  by a long shot.  but i don't use an e-mail client anymore.  i use <a href="http://outlooklive.msn.com/">Outlook Live</a>, which is like thunderbird plus <a href="http://www.mozilla.org/projects/calendar/sunbird.html">sunbird</a> plus a bunch of other stuff.  There is an open source competitor to Outlook, but <a href="http://www.novell.com/products/desktop/features/evolution.html">it doesn't run on windows</a>.  i have used it on <a href="http://www.novell.com/linux/suse/">linux</a>, and it works well.  on top of all that, i barely use outlook for email, since i have a <a href="http://www.gmail.com">GMail</a> account.  personally, i think gmail is better than thunderbird, but i know some people need their email offline.</p>
<p><strong>Office/Word Processing</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.openoffice.org">OpenOffice.org</a><br />
back before microsoft started requiring activation for it's office products, all the cool kids in school had cracked copies of it.  all the losers were stuck with the wordperfect that came with their dell paperweights.  that's over now.  openoffice a full office suite: presentations (read:powerpoint), word processing, spreadsheets, page layout (read:pagemaker).  the only complaints about it are that it doesn't have a database (read:access) program, and that not all macros translate perfectly.  given that i'm an architect, and none of my documents are that complex, none of this has affected me.  I've been using this at work and at home for two years, and haven't had any issues. <strong>Bonus:</strong> <a href="http://www.archgfx.net/blog/index.php/2004/geek/sp2-insecurities/">when a vius decides to delete all your files</a>, it won't bother with OOo's native format. (anything you've saved as a microsoft format for sending to coworkers is fair game, though).</p>
<p><strong><acronym title='Portable Document Format'><span class='caps'>PDF</span></acronym> Creating</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.pdf995.com/download.html"><acronym title='Portable Document Format'><span class='caps'>PDF</span></acronym> 995</a><br />
<strong>Not Open Source</strong>.  this is shareware.  it's free ($), but it will nag you to pay $9.95.  nagging aside, this is the best and simplest <acronym title='Portable Document Format'><span class='caps'>PDF</span></acronym> writer there is.  it installs itself as a printer, so you can use it from any program.  handles multiple page <acronym title='Portable Document Format'><span class='caps'>PDF</span></acronym>'s easily.  don't forget to install both PDF995 AND the free converter.  the converter is free because it's based on <a href="http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~ghost/">ghostscript</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Photo Editting</strong><br />
<a href="http://gimp.org/windows/">The GIMP</a><br />
Image Editting is my stock and trade.  giving up photoshop was such a pain.  but it is possible.  caveat:  the learning curve on this program is BRUTAL.  ESPECIALLY if you are already used to photoshop, fireworks, photopaint, or any commercial software.  but all the tools are there, you just have to dig.  if you want to edit <acronym title='Portable Document Format'><span class='caps'>PDF</span></acronym>'s (like photoshop), you'll need to install <a href="http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~ghost/doc/<acronym title='GNU General Public License'><span class='caps'>GPL</span></acronym>/gpl850.htm">ghostscript</a>, and add its directory to $PATH (usually <code>C:\gs\gs8.50</code> )</p>
<p><strong>Photo Managing</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.picasa.com/">Picasa</a><br />
<strong>Not Open Source</strong>.  i know your digital camera came with photo managing software.  that doesn't mean you have to use it.  i know way too many people who have tons of pictures in their camera's software, and have no idea where to find the file if they need to email it.  Thanks, Kodak.  i wouldn't recommend this software if it weren't for that.  this is how google does photos: Simple.</p>
<p><strong>Music Player</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.real.com">Realplayer</a><br />
I actually use windows media player, because it runs on my xbox, but realplayer connects to my minidisc player.  and it's built on an open source core.  and it runs on linux (and plays mp3s!).  winamp never made the jump from mp3 player to media library.  realplayer did it, and did it more gracefully than any other program.</p>
<p><strong><acronym title='Rich Site Summary'><span class='caps'>RSS</span></acronym> Reader</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.newsgator.com">NewsGator</a><br />
<strong>Not Open Source</strong>.  let's be real here.  i don't use an <acronym title='Rich Site Summary'><span class='caps'>RSS</span></acronym> reader.  they all suck.  they all cost more than a browser, and provide no added value.  i use <a href="http://akregator.sourceforge.net/">Akregator</a> on linux, for it's lightness, the fact that it sits in my system tray, and it's integration with konqueror.  none of the windows readers have that.  i use newsgator's online reader because it's gui doesn't suck (yes i'm refererring to bloglines there) and because it integrates with their media center reader (which is free, and is the "desktop" reader i use).  and i actually like their feedstation.  i click "add to my podcasts" at work, and feedstation downloads it at home.  but i'm not going to pay for a reader until it also includes an XMLRPC blogging client (that actually works, like a real wordprocessor).  and it has to work better than akregator.</p>
<p><strong>Web Design</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.nvu.com/">Nvu</a><br />
i'm lying.  i do all my web design in a text editor.  but i'm trying to let myself use this.</p>
<p><strong>FTP</strong><br />
<a href="http://filezilla.sourceforge.net/">FileZilla</a><br />
you remember when we all used to do filesharing over FTP on audiogalaxy with ws_FTP?  yeah, 1998's gone.  filezilla is a proper ftp client.  i also use <a href="http://winscp.net/eng/index.php">WinSCP</a> for <acronym title='Secure File Transfer Protocol'><span class='caps'>SFTP</span></acronym>.</p>
<p><strong>Bittorrent</strong><br />
<a href="http://azureus.sf.net">Azureus</a><br />
if you're ever going to make the leap to linux, you'll need a bittorrent client.  if you're using it for anything else, i don't wanna know.</p>
<p>i use a lot of other software, but most of it isn't applicable to anyone else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://archgfx.net/blog/2006/geek/free-software-for-windows/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

