<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comment Authority</title>
	<atom:link href="http://archgfx.net/blog/2008/geek/blogging/comment-authority/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://archgfx.net/blog/2008/geek/blogging/comment-authority</link>
	<description>Austin web designer - Adam Freetly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:45:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://archgfx.net/blog/2008/geek/blogging/comment-authority/comment-page-1#comment-32259</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 16:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archgfx.net/?p=1379#comment-32259</guid>
		<description>I guess my main question is somewhat economic - what&#039;s to guarantee that Intense Debate will still be around in 3 years?  I don&#039;t see a lot of room for advertising, and a freemium model would seem to push people away, long term (paid-for truthiness isn&#039;t really viable).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess my main question is somewhat economic &#8211; what&#8217;s to guarantee that Intense Debate will still be around in 3 years?  I don&#8217;t see a lot of room for advertising, and a freemium model would seem to push people away, long term (paid-for truthiness isn&#8217;t really viable).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://archgfx.net/blog/2008/geek/blogging/comment-authority/comment-page-1#comment-32258</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 16:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archgfx.net/?p=1379#comment-32258</guid>
		<description>Michael - 
Thanks for stopping by.  I did go ahead and run the ID plugin long enough to import all the comments there as well.

I&#039;m not trying to suggest that your or any of your competitors are necessarily malicious, but it is still an act of trust by the owner of the website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael &#8211;<br />
Thanks for stopping by.  I did go ahead and run the ID plugin long enough to import all the comments there as well.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not trying to suggest that your or any of your competitors are necessarily malicious, but it is still an act of trust by the owner of the website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Koenig</title>
		<link>http://archgfx.net/blog/2008/geek/blogging/comment-authority/comment-page-1#comment-32257</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Koenig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 20:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archgfx.net/?p=1379#comment-32257</guid>
		<description>I speak on behalf of IntenseDebate and I can assure you that we pose no security risk to your database or email addresses.  Your privacy and trust in our service is paramount and you should have full confidence that as part of the blogging world we operate with the highest degree of personal and company integrity.

Kind regards,
Michael Koenig
IntenseDebate</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I speak on behalf of IntenseDebate and I can assure you that we pose no security risk to your database or email addresses.  Your privacy and trust in our service is paramount and you should have full confidence that as part of the blogging world we operate with the highest degree of personal and company integrity.</p>
<p>Kind regards,<br />
Michael Koenig<br />
IntenseDebate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
