<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yet Another I Hate IE Post</title>
	<atom:link href="http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/geek/blogging/yet-another-i-hate-ie-post/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/geek/blogging/yet-another-i-hate-ie-post</link>
	<description>Austin web designer - Adam Freetly</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/geek/blogging/yet-another-i-hate-ie-post#comment-12589</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 22:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/asides/yet-another-i-hate-ie-post#comment-12589</guid>
		<description>-nod-

i switched to jpg's and the problem went away.  if your photoshop gamma is normally ok, i'll assume it's something similar to the safari problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>-nod-</p>
<p>i switched to jpg&#8217;s and the problem went away.  if your photoshop gamma is normally ok, i&#8217;ll assume it&#8217;s something similar to the safari problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: that girl again</title>
		<link>http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/geek/blogging/yet-another-i-hate-ie-post#comment-12588</link>
		<dc:creator>that girl again</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 22:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/asides/yet-another-i-hate-ie-post#comment-12588</guid>
		<description>My bet is that it's .pngs. My last two redesigns resorted to hacks to get around the fact that IE was rendering the background colour of the .pngs completely differently to FF. Since I loathe browser-specific hacks and feel a little bit soiled by using them, I think I'm going to have to go back to .jpgs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My bet is that it&#8217;s .pngs. My last two redesigns resorted to hacks to get around the fact that <acronym title='Internet Explorer'><span class='caps'>IE</span></acronym> was rendering the background colour of the .pngs completely differently to FF. Since I loathe browser-specific hacks and feel a little bit soiled by using them, I think I&#8217;m going to have to go back to .jpgs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
