<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: misty eyed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/geek/blogging/misty-eyed/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/geek/blogging/misty-eyed</link>
	<description>Austin web designer - Adam Freetly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 09:47:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/geek/blogging/misty-eyed/comment-page-1#comment-12605</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 20:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/asides/misty-eyed#comment-12605</guid>
		<description>@ root-
i think that&#039;s what matt&#039;s getting at.  i like using asides, and that preference shouldn&#039;t predicate, or impinge upon, my design/aesthetic choices.
@ tt-
again, i think this is what matt&#039;s suggesting, despite it being contradicted by the majority of the themes installed here.  the process of editting/installing/normalizing wp.com themes is supposed to bring them up to a baseline standard of functionality.  most of the older themes don&#039;t meet this baseline, which is probably due to the limited number of staff focusing their efforts on new themes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ root-<br />
i think that&#8217;s what matt&#8217;s getting at.  i like using asides, and that preference shouldn&#8217;t predicate, or impinge upon, my design/aesthetic choices.<br />
@ tt-<br />
again, i think this is what matt&#8217;s suggesting, despite it being contradicted by the majority of the themes installed here.  the process of editting/installing/normalizing wp.com themes is supposed to bring them up to a baseline standard of functionality.  most of the older themes don&#8217;t meet this baseline, which is probably due to the limited number of staff focusing their efforts on new themes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Root</title>
		<link>http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/geek/blogging/misty-eyed/comment-page-1#comment-12604</link>
		<dc:creator>Root</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 20:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/asides/misty-eyed#comment-12604</guid>
		<description>I am not sure if asides are a *design* decision. More like a web construction choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure if asides are a *design* decision. More like a web construction choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timethief</title>
		<link>http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/geek/blogging/misty-eyed/comment-page-1#comment-12603</link>
		<dc:creator>timethief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 03:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/asides/misty-eyed#comment-12603</guid>
		<description>From my viewpoint if a theme doesn&#039;t function as I want it to then whatever its design may be - I&#039;m not going to use it. That&#039;s why I don&#039;t understand what Matt said:
&lt;blockquote&gt; Themes should be design decisions, not functionality decisions. &lt;/blockquote&gt; 

Presumably Andy&#039;s bit of code will one day be added to all the themes and we&#039;ll have asides. I&#039;m wondering if that event will follow or precede the event of equipping all themes with widgets. 

I immediately switched two of my blogs to the Misty Look theme. I now have contact pages and fonts of a readable size as well as a clean looking theme I can easily create headers for. YAY! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From my viewpoint if a theme doesn&#8217;t function as I want it to then whatever its design may be &#8211; I&#8217;m not going to use it. That&#8217;s why I don&#8217;t understand what Matt said:</p>
<blockquote><p> Themes should be design decisions, not functionality decisions. </p></blockquote>
<p>Presumably Andy&#8217;s bit of code will one day be added to all the themes and we&#8217;ll have asides. I&#8217;m wondering if that event will follow or precede the event of equipping all themes with widgets. </p>
<p>I immediately switched two of my blogs to the Misty Look theme. I now have contact pages and fonts of a readable size as well as a clean looking theme I can easily create headers for. YAY! <img src='http://archgfx.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/geek/blogging/misty-eyed/comment-page-1#comment-12602</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 17:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/asides/misty-eyed#comment-12602</guid>
		<description>there&#039;s a logistic headache i can&#039;t get my head all the way around.  that means using your &lt;code&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;/code&gt; method for every theme then, since not all themes have styling for asides?  or just adding the equivalent of andy&#039;s CSS to the code for every theme?  

i suppose in that light, sidebar asides would be &lt;em&gt;easier&lt;/em&gt;.


nonetheless, i have to agree about themes as design decisions.  although i still think that the skins/mods distinction makes way more sense than including all that PHP for a design decision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there&#8217;s a logistic headache i can&#8217;t get my head all the way around.  that means using your <code>&lt;ul&gt;</code> method for every theme then, since not all themes have styling for asides?  or just adding the equivalent of andy&#8217;s <acronym title='Cascading Style Sheets'><span class='caps'>CSS</span></acronym> to the code for every theme?  </p>
<p>i suppose in that light, sidebar asides would be <em>easier</em>.</p>
<p>nonetheless, i have to agree about themes as design decisions.  although i still think that the skins/mods distinction makes way more sense than including all that <acronym title='PHP Hypertext Processor'><span class='caps'>PHP</span></acronym> for a design decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/geek/blogging/misty-eyed/comment-page-1#comment-12601</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 17:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/asides/misty-eyed#comment-12601</guid>
		<description>Because introducing features like asides in only some of the themes is far more annoying. Themes should be design decisions, not functionality decisions. When/if we officially do asides, it&#039;ll be in all themes equally, and far easier than using a different interface for every single theme to configure it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because introducing features like asides in only some of the themes is far more annoying. Themes should be design decisions, not functionality decisions. When/if we officially do asides, it&#8217;ll be in all themes equally, and far easier than using a different interface for every single theme to configure it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

