<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: but love is not what you&#8217;re thinking of.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/asides/but-love-is-not-what-youre-thinking-of/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/asides/but-love-is-not-what-youre-thinking-of</link>
	<description>Austin web designer - Adam Freetly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 09:47:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: timethief</title>
		<link>http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/asides/but-love-is-not-what-youre-thinking-of/comment-page-1#comment-12624</link>
		<dc:creator>timethief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 23:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/asides/but-love-is-not-what-youre-thinking-of#comment-12624</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not impressed by Matt&#039;s off topic delivery of a slap in the face to wank. 

Wank&#039;s themes are not the subject matter of this post. 

After all, what valuable contribution do off topic adolescent snipes make to  civilized discourse?  

I would suggest the answer is: &lt;strong&gt; absolutely nothing. &lt;/strong&gt;

It&#039;s my experience that off topic sniping this is a tactic employed by those who  are determined either to distract or to shut others up. 

So why would anyone in their right mind want to establish a reputation for being a sniper?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not impressed by Matt&#8217;s off topic delivery of a slap in the face to wank. </p>
<p>Wank&#8217;s themes are not the subject matter of this post. </p>
<p>After all, what valuable contribution do off topic adolescent snipes make to  civilized discourse?  </p>
<p>I would suggest the answer is: <strong> absolutely nothing. </strong></p>
<p>It&#8217;s my experience that off topic sniping this is a tactic employed by those who  are determined either to distract or to shut others up. </p>
<p>So why would anyone in their right mind want to establish a reputation for being a sniper?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/asides/but-love-is-not-what-youre-thinking-of/comment-page-1#comment-12623</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/asides/but-love-is-not-what-youre-thinking-of#comment-12623</guid>
		<description>i&#039;d say treacle is significantly &lt;em&gt;better&lt;/em&gt; than most of the crap here.  

but then, not being blue, involving gradients, or glossy overlays might have been its downfall.

i&#039;m afraid i&#039;ll have to work harder at pissing people off to get the same said about any themes i release.  

i almost removed matt&#039;s comment, were it not for the fact that most of my posts violate my guidelines, making them a bit unenforceable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;d say treacle is significantly <em>better</em> than most of the crap here.  </p>
<p>but then, not being blue, involving gradients, or glossy overlays might have been its downfall.</p>
<p>i&#8217;m afraid i&#8217;ll have to work harder at pissing people off to get the same said about any themes i release.  </p>
<p>i almost removed matt&#8217;s comment, were it not for the fact that most of my posts violate my guidelines, making them a bit unenforceable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/asides/but-love-is-not-what-youre-thinking-of/comment-page-1#comment-12622</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/asides/but-love-is-not-what-youre-thinking-of#comment-12622</guid>
		<description>Actually the code that this fellow has put together for his generator isn&#039;t bad at all. I just get nervous when people make things up. Sometimes, making things up is good, e.g., &lt;code&gt;rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;link rel=&quot;first&quot; ... &lt;/code&gt;. Othertimes, not so, e.g., &lt;code&gt;skype://username&lt;/code&gt; (or whatever that style is, can&#039;t remember). 

Here, here, for using &lt;code&gt;cite&lt;/code&gt; when citing something, notably a license.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually the code that this fellow has put together for his generator isn&#8217;t bad at all. I just get nervous when people make things up. Sometimes, making things up is good, e.g., <code>rel="nofollow"</code>, <code>link rel="first" ... </code>. Othertimes, not so, e.g., <code>skype://username</code> (or whatever that style is, can&#8217;t remember). </p>
<p>Here, here, for using <code>cite</code> when citing something, notably a license.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: that girl again</title>
		<link>http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/asides/but-love-is-not-what-youre-thinking-of/comment-page-1#comment-12621</link>
		<dc:creator>that girl again</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/asides/but-love-is-not-what-youre-thinking-of#comment-12621</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;wank, I don’t think any of your themes are in danger of being used here. :)&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;ve never made any great claims for my design skills but I didn&#039;t think my stuff was &lt;em&gt;significantly&lt;/em&gt; worse than, say, &#039;Sweet Blossoms&#039;. Ah well, I&#039;ll live.

My reference to &#039;people&#039; was to, you know, &lt;em&gt;people&lt;/em&gt;, rather than wordpress.com specifically. You&#039;re not the first user to disregard a designer&#039;s terms of use and you won&#039;t, unfortunately, be the last.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>wank, I don’t think any of your themes are in danger of being used here. <img src='http://archgfx.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;ve never made any great claims for my design skills but I didn&#8217;t think my stuff was <em>significantly</em> worse than, say, &#8216;Sweet Blossoms&#8217;. Ah well, I&#8217;ll live.</p>
<p>My reference to &#8216;people&#8217; was to, you know, <em>people</em>, rather than wordpress.com specifically. You&#8217;re not the first user to disregard a designer&#8217;s terms of use and you won&#8217;t, unfortunately, be the last.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/asides/but-love-is-not-what-youre-thinking-of/comment-page-1#comment-12620</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/asides/but-love-is-not-what-youre-thinking-of#comment-12620</guid>
		<description>you can check out the code it generates in my sidebar.  semantics probably dictate that it should be more like &lt;code&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;...&quot; rel=&quot;license&quot; type=&quot;license/cc+attribute&quot;&gt;..&lt;/a&gt; &lt;cite rel=&quot;cc:attributionName&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;...&quot; rel=&quot;cc:attributionURL&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/cite&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you can check out the code it generates in my sidebar.  semantics probably dictate that it should be more like <code>&lt;a href="..." rel="license" type="license/cc+attribute"&gt;..&lt;/a&gt; &lt;cite rel="cc:attributionName"&gt;&lt;a href="..." rel="cc:attributionURL"&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/cite&gt;</code></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

