this whole zune thing annoys me. microsoft is pretending to get it, with their whole "music the way it wants to be" marketing speak. Yes, it's true, music is nothing if it's not communal. But that's not what microsoft is actually selling. The music you get from your friends isn't a mix tape. it's DRM'ed, and you can only listen to it on your zune. pffft.
The really ugly thing, though, is that they're ripping off everyone except themselves and UMG. A music tax is not a new idea, nor is it a bad one. But it is a difficult one to implement, because it requires such an overhaul of the current system.
Microsoft's system gives 1 dollar to UMG for every zune sold. once. There is no provision for non-UMG artists to get paid. UMG is only giving half of that dollar to artists, and they have thousands of artists. (And you thought CD's were a bad deal for artists). And does paying this tax on your Zune exempt you from the RIAA's jon doe suits?
These are the exact problems that blur/banff set out to solve. Microsoft should be paying out a higher tax, and they shouldn't be paying it out to 1 record label, or even to the RIAA. They should be paying out that royalty to an ASCAP like organization, who could dole out the tax to artists according to the number of times that their songs were shared by Zune users. (if they're already wrapping the shared songs in DRM, you can bet they know what songs you've traded).
But it won't happen. because then the RIAA would have to agree not to sue users who were paying the tax. and they would miss out on their half of that tax.
Post a Comment