<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: another point missed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://archgfx.net/blog/2006/music/another-point-missed/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://archgfx.net/blog/2006/music/another-point-missed</link>
	<description>Austin web designer - Adam Freetly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 09:47:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://archgfx.net/blog/2006/music/another-point-missed/comment-page-1#comment-246</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archgfx.net/blog/index.php/2006/music/another-point-missed/#comment-246</guid>
		<description>FWIW, i wouldn&#039;t currently purchase a DRM CD either, and i (almost) never by from member labels of the RIAA.

however, after reading and listening to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.managingrights.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;robert weber&lt;/a&gt;, i have to agree with him.  if every artist could DRM their own CD&#039;s in a system where i could use that music anywhere i wanted, but still couldn&#039;t share it with an unlimited number of internet users, i &lt;b&gt;would&lt;/b&gt; buy that CD.

currently, that system doesn&#039;t exist (i&#039;d have to buy a song 3 times to listen to it at work, at home, and on the train.), and even if artists self-published, itunes and MSN music directories aren&#039;t open, so they wouldn&#039;t stand to benefit from it.

my big issue with the petition is that hundreds of slashdot idiots will sign it, and continue to use PGP signatures and other forms of DRM, without acknowledging the inherent hypocricy.  most of them object to DRM only because they don&#039;t want to pay for music, and don&#039;t understand the problem of the artist getting paid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FWIW, i wouldn&#8217;t currently purchase a <acronym title='Digital Rights Management'><span class='caps'>DRM</span></acronym> <acronym title='Compact Disc'><span class='caps'>CD</span></acronym> either, and i (almost) never by from member labels of the <acronym title='Recording Industry Association of America'><span class='caps'>RIAA</span></acronym>.</p>
<p>however, after reading and listening to <a href="http://www.managingrights.com/" >robert weber</a>, i have to agree with him.  if every artist could <acronym title='Digital Rights Management'><span class='caps'>DRM</span></acronym> their own <acronym title='Compact Disc'><span class='caps'>CD</span></acronym>&#8217;s in a system where i could use that music anywhere i wanted, but still couldn&#8217;t share it with an unlimited number of internet users, i <b>would</b> buy that <acronym title='Compact Disc'><span class='caps'>CD</span></acronym>.</p>
<p>currently, that system doesn&#8217;t exist (i&#8217;d have to buy a song 3 times to listen to it at work, at home, and on the train.), and even if artists self-published, itunes and <acronym title='Microsoft Network'><span class='caps'>MSN</span></acronym> music directories aren&#8217;t open, so they wouldn&#8217;t stand to benefit from it.</p>
<p>my big issue with the petition is that hundreds of slashdot idiots will sign it, and continue to use PGP signatures and other forms of <acronym title='Digital Rights Management'><span class='caps'>DRM</span></acronym>, without acknowledging the inherent hypocricy.  most of them object to <acronym title='Digital Rights Management'><span class='caps'>DRM</span></acronym> only because they don&#8217;t want to pay for music, and don&#8217;t understand the problem of the artist getting paid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elizabeth</title>
		<link>http://archgfx.net/blog/2006/music/another-point-missed/comment-page-1#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>elizabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 04:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archgfx.net/blog/index.php/2006/music/another-point-missed/#comment-245</guid>
		<description>in fact, i don&#039;t think we&#039;ve missed the point at all. we *are* boycotting the companies that are using certain technologies. we are doing so because we disagree with their use of DRM (although, of course, i can think of many other reasons to boycott the RIAA.) so in fact, we&#039;re not blaming the technology inherently, we&#039;re blaming its implementation by the so-called &quot;content owners&quot; and &quot;rights holders.&quot; (don&#039;t you love how those so blatantly leave no reference to the creators?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in fact, i don&#8217;t think we&#8217;ve missed the point at all. we *are* boycotting the companies that are using certain technologies. we are doing so because we disagree with their use of <acronym title='Digital Rights Management'><span class='caps'>DRM</span></acronym> (although, of course, i can think of many other reasons to boycott the <acronym title='Recording Industry Association of America'><span class='caps'>RIAA</span></acronym>.) so in fact, we&#8217;re not blaming the technology inherently, we&#8217;re blaming its implementation by the so-called &#8220;content owners&#8221; and &#8220;rights holders.&#8221; (don&#8217;t you love how those so blatantly leave no reference to the creators?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

